Journal article
Private tree removal, public loss: Valuing and enforcing existing tree protection mechanisms is the key to retaining urban trees on private land
Chris Clark, Camilo Ordonez, Stephen J Livesley
Landscape and Urban Planning | Elsevier | Published : 2020
Abstract
In many cities, private trees dominate urban tree canopy cover, but densification often means fewer private trees and diminishing urban tree canopy cover. Local governments use several mechanisms to protect trees on private land, but their strengths and weaknesses are not well understood. We review private tree protections in six local governments in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia and interview 23 urban planning and urban forest professionals to understand their perspectives on; 1) the causes of private tree removal, 2) the efficacy of significant tree registers, local laws, and planning overlays, and 3) ways to improve the protection of trees on private land. Each local government applie..
View full abstractRelated Projects (1)
Grants
Awarded by HIA Project
Awarded by Australian Research Council (ARC)
Funding Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the help of the urban planning and forest professionals who gave their time and expertise. The project was supported by HIA Project #NY18002, "Global review of incentive schemes for the retention and successful establishment of trees on private urban lands" and Australian Research Council (ARC) 3 Linkage Partnership grant #LP160100780, "Managing urban trees for people and wildlife.